RGIII and Andrew Luck: Still at the Head of their
Class
.jpg)
As a starting reference, here are the win-loss records across different levels of support for all QBs through the first four weeks of the 2012 season.
QB SUPPORT
|
Less than 1.5
|
1.5 to 1.99
|
2 to 2.99
|
3 to 3.99
|
4 to 4.99
|
5+
|
WINS
|
2
|
4
|
11
|
17
|
12
|
17
|
LOSSES
|
27
|
8
|
13
|
5
|
5
|
1
|
Again, there seems to be big changes in winning
percentage between QB who receive support levels below two (6 - 35), support levels between two and three (11 - 13), and support levels over three (46
- 11). Also, winning percentage increases as we go up in support at each subgroup
EXCEPT from the 3 to 3.99 to the 4 to 4.99 categories. I suspect this is statistical
noise, and would also point out that of the five losses in the 4 to 4.99
category, three have involved Ryan Tannehill, Russell Wilson, or Brandon
Wheeden. I think as the season progresses, we’ll see a greater winning
percentage in the 4s than in the 3s.
Games in the 2 to 2.99 support levels are generally
a toss-up that could go either way. A team will need strong play out of their
QB to win, but it seems to be a 50/50 shot. With support less than two, it’s an
uphill battle for any QB, and with support above 3, most teams can expect a
win, as long as their QB can provide a relatively adequate game. Of course, as
we get past five, it’s all but a guaranteed victory for a team that gets any
reasonable output from their QB.
With that in mind, let’s take a look at how RGIII
and Luck stack up against the rest of their cohort. Consider the following
statistics for games played through Week 4**:
**I
included Luck’s Week 5 game because he had a bye in week 4. This way, the table
captures the first four games played by each QB **
QB
|
Games with Support > 3
|
Avg Support
|
Record after four games
|
Wilson
|
4
|
4.71
|
2-2
|
Tannehill
|
3
|
4.00
|
1-3
|
Wheeden
|
1
|
2.39
|
0-4
|
RGIII
|
0
|
2.15
|
2-2
|
Luck
|
0
|
1.84
|
2-2
|
Wilson had support levels above 3 EVERY week (and
above 4 in all but one), and yet the Seahawks were only at .500 going into week
5. Tannenhill had 3 weeks of support above 3, and yet the Dolphins won only one
of those games (where support was closer to 6). Wheeden only had one game above
3 (it was above four in fact), but he failed to win that one too. In short, these
three QBs are not always winning the games one would expect an average QB to win, and
they are certainly not winning any others. They are rookies though.
They
are rookies though. Just as I think that is a semi-reasonable
excuse thus far for Wilson/Tannehill/Wheeden, I also think it suggests that we
might have something very special on our hands when it comes to RGIII and Luck.
Let’s take a look at their game by game support levels.
RGIII
|
QB SUPPORT
|
OPPONENT
|
FINAL SCORE
|
WIN
|
2.065
|
Saints
|
40-32
|
LOSS
|
1.51
|
Rams
|
28-31
|
LOSS
|
2.72
|
Bengals
|
31-38
|
WIN
|
2.305
|
Buccanrs
|
24-22
|
LUCK
|
QB SUPPORT
|
OPPONENT
|
FINAL SCORE
|
LOSS
|
0.81
|
BEARS
|
21-41
|
WIN
|
2.445
|
VIKINGS
|
23-20
|
LOSS
|
1.11
|
JAGUARS
|
17-22
|
WIN
|
2.975
|
PACKERS
|
30-27
|
Both QBs have won two games with support levels
between 2 and 2.99 (though Luck’s last one was very close to 3). What’s been
more impressive than that, however, is just how close they have come to winning
games at even lower levels of support. Luck’s loss in week 1 is the only time
either QB has lost by more than one score. Let’s take a closer look at RGIII’s
loss to the Rams and Luck’s loss to the Jaguars.
Against the Rams, RGIII’s teammates rushed for 94
yards and allowed the Rams to put up 31 points. RGIII only had to outperform 24
points, however, because the Redskins defense added a TD of their own off a
fumble recovery. Still, without a single
possession starting past his own 40 and only 10 possessions total, RGIII had
some work to do if he wanted to keep the Redskins in the game. He went 20/29
passing, threw for 206 yards (and 1 TD), and he added another 82 yards on the
ground (including 2 TDs) while turning the ball over just once on his way to adding
21 more points for the Redskins.
Luck had even less help when he played the Jaguars.
Luck’s offense had to overcome 22 points. Like RGIII against the Rams, Luck
also did not start a single possession past his own 40 yard line, and his
teammates contributed only 74 yards on the ground on 25 carries. Making things
harder, Adam Vinatieri missed a 36 yard field goal. Luck also turned the ball
over once, but it was Luck’s contributions on offense that not only kept the
Colts within five, but put them on the 26 yard line with just seconds left for one
last Hail Mary attempt. It didn’t work out, and the Colts lost. Still, Luck’s
313 passing yards and the 50 more he added with his legs were pretty special
contributions from a rookie QB who was asked to put up more than 22 points with
very little help in regards to the ground game, field position, or the kicking
game.
The wins that Luck and RGIII have led their teams to
show that the Colts and Redskins can win right now while asking their QBs to do
more than just “manage the game.” The close losses where support was at 1.51 or
even 1.11 show that these QBs are just a step away from being able to carry
their teams to victory the same way some of the more celebrated veterans do. At
this point, they are still worlds away from the other rookie QBs when it comes to
helping their teams win. For now, Luck and RGIII are still firmly at the head
of their class.
No comments:
Post a Comment