TOP PERFORMERS: P. Manning, A. Luck, C. Kaepernick
Kaepernick
and Luck won games with low QB Support and Manninng took his average support
and turned it into a rout. Anyone who can read a box score (or who has eyes)
should have figured out that Kaepernick and Manning would end up with high TAVA
scores, and I don’t feel the need to discuss their dominant performances in
depth. But why does Luck score so high? He had under 200 yards passing and the
Colts only scored 21 points. Well, it has to do with efficiency, not of
individual passes, but of drives.
Luck’s
low QB support was partly due to a lack of possessions. While Manning had 14
active possessions (and 2 kneel down possessions) and Kaepernick had 15, Luck
had only 7 active possessions. While the Colts defense was busy allowing 171
rushing yards (31st in the league) and letting Oakland convert on 7
third downs, that clock was ticking. Not only did Luck not get a lot of chances
with the ball, he didn’t have a single drive with great field position. And
yet, he helped convert 3/7 of those possessions into long TD drives of 80, 69,
and 80 yards. That turns out to be 3 points per drive, which is especially
impressive considering that all but one drive (starting from the Colts 31)
started at the Colts 20 or worse.
ALONG FOR THE RIDE: M. Vick, T. Brady, J. Locker
Locker
is the easiest to understand in this group. His defense allowed 9 points, his
teammates added 109 rushing yards, and he had great field position a number of
times. Locker’s lackluster (11/20, 125 yards) performance was a major reason
this was a one score game and the Titans never pulled away.
Vick
helped “lead” the Eagles offense on four TD drives, but that’s less impressive
when you consider that he had the league’s best rushing attack (league leading
even when you exclude all of Vick’s rushing yards) and some great field
position. The Eagles TD drives were 25 yards, 34 yards (Vick contributed -4
yards), 44 yards (Vick contributed 3 yards), and 62 yards. On possessions starting
behind their own 30, the Eagles scored only 3 points on five tries despite the rushing
yards Vick’s teammates continued to provide. They struggled to put together
long scoring drives and that was a big reason that the Redskins were able to
stay in this game as long as they did. Add Vick’s fumble that Washington returned
for a TD, and you have Vick’s low TAVA score.
Brady
may be unfairly grouped here because one thing that lowered his TAVA score was
an interception that hit TE Zach Sudfeld in the palm of his hands and,
subsequently, gave the Bills great field position. TAVA does not take WR
quality into account and Brady, probably more than most other QBs this season,
can use his depleted WR corps as an excuse. Still, 17 of the offense’s points
came from a FG drive starting at the 50 yard line and two TD drives starting at
the Bills 16 and 32 yard lines. In 9 possessions that started deep in Patriots
territory (Own 30 yard line or worse), the Patriots had 6 punts, two Brady
turnovers (though, to be fair, one was a 4th and 1 fumble at the
goaline), and only 3 points. This was despite a strong rushing effort led by
Shane Vereen. A more productive passing attack, and this game wouldn’t have
needed a 4th quarter come from behind field goal.
GOOD (LOSING) EFFORT: Aaron Rodgers
Rodgers
had the highest TAVA score of any losing QB in week 1. His team allowed 34
points, his teammates added only 50 rushing yards to help him out, and he had
some fairly poor field position to boot. What’s crazy is that Rodgers TAVA
score would be even higher if Jermichael Finley hadn’t dropped/thrown a pass
right into hands of the 49ers defense, resulting in Rodger’s only INT. Rodgers
and his ability to help the team move the ball down the field for TDs was the
only thing that kept this game close.
PLEASE SEND HELP: Blaine Gabbert
The
offense scored zero points. He averaged less than 4 yards per attempt,
completed less than 50% of his passes, and, if that wasn’t enough, he threw a
pick six. I don’t think I need to offer any fancy analysis here. Gabbert was horrible.
No comments:
Post a Comment